from: http://rss.slashdot.org/ ~ r / Slashdot / slashdot / ~ 3/03Vcw56-tys/Evaluating-Patent-Troll-Myths:
An anonymous reader writes In a guest post on the blog Patently-O, Villanova University professor Michael Risch summarizes his detailed study of the methods and effectiveness of patent trolls He writes: It turns out that most of this I thought trolls. – Good or bad – was wrong …. Perhaps the biggest surprise in the study was the source of the patents I thought most of the patents from failed startups in these patents were represented (about 14% of the original assignees were dead), most are come .. companies still operating in 2010. Indeed, more than a third of the original assignees were listed, a subsidiary of a public corporation or the beneficiaries of venture capital. Only 21% were entities asserting patent at the time of grant, and many of those companies inventor property (such as Katz) rather than acquisition of entities (such as Acacia). … Another area of surprise was the quality of patents. While the trolls almost never won their case if they were going to trial (only three cases have led to a violation conclusion on the merits), the percentage of patents invalidated on the bottom was lower than expected.
- Dell jams a terabyte of storage SSD SATA3 Precision M6600 laptop
- Ask Engadget: the best desktop OS for children?
- Samsung Series 7 PC Slate practice
- Shaming laptop thieves publicly catch the audience in the Crossfire
- Laptops in the classroom Do not increase Grades
- Toshiba Qosmio DX730 all-in-one styles Regza brings to your desktop
- Error rates to record low Qubit Processor
- Xone Vodafone R and D center opens in Silicon Valley, wants to help startups grow
- Sony unveils new drive Wi-Fi is the world’s lightest 6-inch e-reader with multitouch screen
- Zero1 Remote Control for IOS VooMote Zapper hands on (video)